South Africa’s newly released draft AI policy lays bare a strategic dilemma that many emerging economies are beginning to feel: heavy reliance on U.S. and Chinese hardware threatens national data security. The document, published last week by the Department of Communications and Digital Technologies, openly acknowledges that the country’s current dependence on foreign infrastructure could expose sensitive information to geopolitical pressures.
“Reliance on foreign infrastructure compromises the security of sensitive South African data,” the draft reads. “Therefore, there is a need to invest in local infrastructure and related data‑sovereignty measures to safeguard the national interest and create plans to reduce the country’s current hardware dependence on the US and China.”
A core recommendation is the development of home‑grown data centres. In his February budget address, Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana elevated data‑centre infrastructure to the same strategic tier as electricity, ports and transport. By treating data centres as essential utilities, the government hopes to attract both domestic and foreign investment while keeping critical data on South African soil.
Nevertheless, building local facilities does not solve the entire problem. Even domestically operated data centres need servers, networking gear and AI accelerators, most of which are currently manufactured in the United States or China. The draft policy therefore signals a broader shift: South Africa must navigate an emerging bifurcation of global technology standards, where distinct ecosystems are forming around the two superpowers.
South Africa AI policy
The split goes far beyond semiconductor supply. It touches networking equipment, cloud platforms, AI training hardware, and the software stacks that run atop them. Huawei’s rollout of its own AI chips after U.S. export restrictions, coupled with Chinese large‑language models built on that silicon, exemplifies the diverging technology stacks now taking shape.
For nations like South Africa—situated in the middle of this technological divide—the danger is being forced into a binary choice, or inadvertently locking into one ecosystem before fully understanding the long‑term ramifications. In March, Washington barred the import and sale of new foreign‑made internet routers, citing national‑security concerns, thereby extending the geopolitical rift from back‑haul infrastructure to consumer‑grade hardware.
The ripple effects are already visible in the mobile sector. At the Mobile World Congress in Spain, GSMA deputy president and MTN Group CEO Ralph Mupita warned that the march toward 6G connectivity could deepen the split in standards. He argued that fragmented supply chains and shrinking economies of scale might leave Africa’s smaller economies lagging further behind in digital infrastructure and connectivity.
“Digital sovereignty is a hotly debated topic among GSMA board members,” Mupita said, noting the paradox of striving for global integration while the world drifts toward de‑globalisation and parallel standards.
South African businesses and public institutions that are currently procuring AI infrastructure face a daunting quandary. Choices made today—whether to adopt a particular cloud provider, which networking vendor to install, or which AI model to integrate—will lock in long‑term switching costs. If the global technology landscape continues to fragment, those procurement decisions will acquire overt geopolitical dimensions that existing policies are ill‑equipped to address.
Communications Minister Solly Malatsi echoed these concerns in an interview with Newzroom Afrika, emphasizing that AI’s impact cuts across all sectors. He called for a collaborative approach that brings together government, industry and civil society to craft a practical, equitable policy. “We are dealing with a technology that is rapidly developing and, if truth be told, we are a little late in the journey of responding to it,” Malatsi admitted.
The draft AI policy remains open for public comment until 10 June, inviting stakeholders to weigh in on how South Africa can safeguard its digital future while navigating the complex tug‑of‑war between the United States and China.
As the nation grapples with the twin challenges of data sovereignty and an increasingly polarized tech ecosystem, the coming weeks will be critical in shaping a framework that protects national interests without isolating South Africa from the global digital economy.
© 2026 NewsCentral Media